178 Comments:

• Made here in England? What the fuck? I thought everyone over here was the way nature intended.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/12/2005 12:20:00 PM  

  ---

• The video, you will be relieved to know, is CG.

  By  Rebecca, at 12/12/2005 08:38:00 PM  

  ---

• I did watch the video and let me tell you, if I didn't already have a natural foreskin I'd be getting one of these babies for sure!
  
  I might get myself a pack anyway. Can't have too many foreskins

  By  Danieru, at 12/13/2005 12:22:00 AM  

  ---

• My Aunt lost her labia in a bizarre synchronised swimming accident, and I was thinking about marketing a female version of this product for flapless ladies. What do you think?

  By  Voodoo Wray, at 12/13/2005 04:40:00 AM  

  ---

• Gee, I feel left out. I wish I was a boy so that I could play with my new "sensitized" penis. Me thinks these would make great stocking stuffers, my family will be so pleased. foreskins for everyone!!!

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 10:00:00 AM  

  ---

• dude! that is nasty! forskin is gross. i cant imagin all the crap that festers in your forskin! not to mention it makes your penis look gross!

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 10:13:00 AM  

  ---

• Damn straight.
  I'm Jewish, and frankly, I find the foreskin more than a little disturbing. There my be more nerves present, but ewwwwwwww. Honestly, I can't even begin to imagin the "stuff" that gets stuck under that flap. Yucky.
  
  
  Captain Lumpy Dog, Away!

  By  Captain Lumpy Dog, at 12/13/2005 10:25:00 AM  

  ---

• MMMMM.....These remind me of the good ole days when my momma used to make me fresh foreskin sandwitches and bagel bites for lunch.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 12:37:00 PM  

  ---

• DingoBoi thinks these make great stocking stuffers!

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 12:40:00 PM  

  ---

• Some of you people have issues... nothing "festers" under a foreskin you dolts, unless you don't take showers or like sticking your dick in cottage cheese. If you want to mutilate your babies, go ahead, but don't go insulting the rest of us!

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 01:10:00 PM  

  ---

• I can't believe that people actually believe this stuff!

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 01:12:00 PM  

  ---

• nasty.........im happy without my foreskin....i dont have to wash anything and my girlfriend likes it better this way..foreskin sandwiches lol

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 01:46:00 PM  

  ---

• First thing first. It's really great that you have the eloquence to not have to resort to insults. Oops. I forgot. You did insult us. If you have a problem with circumcision, that's fine. But don't you DARE go and call one of the oldest and proudest Jewish traditions 'mutiliation.'I was only saying that IN MY OWN OPINION, foreskins are rather nasty. Of course, my personal viewpoint is skewed as I have been circumcised for all almost nineteen years of my life. In closing, if you have personal opinions, that's fine. In fact, in the majority of cases, it is a sign of intelligence (of course, there are exceptions.). But calling a widespread religious tradition 'mutiliation' is a hop, skip and a jump too far. Sorry if I came off as a wee bit pontifical, but I happen to be one very proud Heeb.
  
  Lumpy Dog Away!

  By  Lumpy Dog, at 12/13/2005 01:51:00 PM  

  ---

• The truth hurts huh?

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 01:53:00 PM  

  ---

• Ya gotta wonder who has the time and the mind to com eup with an invention like this?

  By  Josh Payne, at 12/13/2005 02:37:00 PM  

  ---

• to "lumpy dog"
  if i do see correctly, you just called the penis without circumcision "more than a little disturbing". it may not be religious, but we have just as much right as you do to have an opinion. if you can call what we are natually given "disturbing," then we can call what you CUT OFF OF YOURSELF mutilation. don't you belive that cutting yourself is mutilation? don't you look at people in mental hospitals that have cut off parts of their bodies "mutilation"? yes. so shut up. you cut off something you were born with, and to top it off, you would be willing to do that to your children. have you ever done any research on the body part you had cut off? it doesn't take that much to clean, unless you don't shower, and you get so much more pleasure from having it. why else would they make a fake one for guys who don't have it? maybe before you talk shit about something, you should know a little about it first. and don't yell at people for having opinions. we have ours, you have yours, and you have no right to complain about it.

  By  thisisjustacover@yahoo.com, at 12/13/2005 04:00:00 PM  

  ---

• Main Entry: mu·ti·late
  Pronunciation: 'myü-t&l-"At
  Function: transitive verb
  Inflected Form(s): -lat·ed; -lat·ing
  Etymology: Latin mutilatus, past participle of mutilare, from mutilus truncated, maimed
  1 : to cut up or alter radically so as to make imperfect ex. the child mutilated the book with his scissors
  2 : to cut off or permanently destroy a limb or essential part of
  
  
  Yep, sounds like it to me and I don't seem to see any Jewish bris clause in there either so there we have it

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 04:08:00 PM  

  ---

• jewish circumcision is mutilation and it's creepy with the mutilator committing fellatio on the child, sick, sick, sick!!!

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 04:24:00 PM  

  ---

• The reason you can't imagine "stuff" that gets stuck under there or festers under there is nothing does. It's "skin tight" if you will, the only reason stuff would be under there is if you put it there, and now THAT would be weird. Nothing grows under there because of the magical invention we have called bathing.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 04:43:00 PM  

  ---

• I don't think that we really need to result to calling anything nasty or saying things that are insulting towards other's religions or beleifs.
  Now you are all getting into self indulgant arguments and missing the point of this.
  
  That there are faux foreskins to be bought and played with. =D

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 04:44:00 PM  

  ---

• http://www.medicirc.org/major_benefits.html

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 04:58:00 PM  

  ---

• I have a foreskin and I am happy for it. Now when I was a child I had many Jewish friends and they thought foreskin was rather discusting. I wouldn't shower at the end of hockey practices with the team because of this. When we all started having sexual intercourse (for heavens sake not together) they realised that they weren't getting as much pleasure as I and were missing out.
  
  See how the tables turn?

  By  Ty, at 12/13/2005 05:17:00 PM  

  ---

• Ty,
  you are an idiot. I was mutilated as a baby and I still get a lot of pleassure out of sex. SO HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT YOU GET MORE OUT OF IT? IS THERE A WAY TO MEASSURE IT?! Didn't think so, you little monkey. Adios.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 05:26:00 PM  

  ---

• well you said you were mutilated that is a term not used fondly. Are you unsatisfied?
  
  and I don't know how to prove it but the theory is sound.

  By  Ty, at 12/13/2005 05:29:00 PM  

  ---

• well, for the jewish ppl. it's normal to not have their foreskin. and why? simple. because that makes jewish women's happy. and in a soooo much religion and culture that has the matriarchy in the highest levels, making the womens happy will transcend your soul. xD
  
  personaly, i love my foreskin... so many battles we'd have togheter. and is soooo sensible... some minutes touches and frictions with the right you know, and it starts to cry....
  not like those unsensitive jewish ppl.... xD
  
  jokes ;-)

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 05:35:00 PM  

  ---

• Come on guys (and gals). Mutation or not, fester something or not. The topic is "what an idea!!" whoever thought of this. Dare I say, you guys are being jealous why you didn't thought of it first? Please don't take it seriously, enjoy life, it is too short to get upset on little comments like that. I don't know whether having it or not, makes any difference in bed. Comment on that, and enjoy....

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 07:26:00 PM  

  ---

• Yeah, I sure wish that "some minutes touches and frictions with the right you know, and it starts to cry" Women love premature ejaculation.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 07:53:00 PM  

  ---

• i am circumcised and i think sex is great. My friend is not circumcised and he thinks sex is great. Argument over

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 08:11:00 PM  

  ---

• Wow, y'all are awesome. Sit around and argue about foreskins on the computer, and get really mad and in racial disputes over it, too! Wow, this is like some sort of soap opera.

  By  Mr. Sensible, at 12/13/2005 08:14:00 PM  

  ---

• Seriously guys,
  First- circumsizion or however you spell it is not only for jewish people, i am catholic and i am circumcized.
  second- how can you say you have more pleasure from sex if you have never experienced it without your foreskin, now chop it off and have sex and then you can critizize but until then stop with the BS!
  
  This is all just stupid fighting that wont end because people are Jew bashing and vice versa which is stupid. So why cant you all be happy with what you got and stop bitchin about what other people dont.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 08:39:00 PM  

  ---

• "i dont have to wash anything and my girlfriend likes it better this way"
  That's probably because your girlfriend has never been with an uncircumcized guy. Evidence:
  
  "With their circumcised partners, women were more likely not to have a vaginal orgasm. Conversely, women were more likely to have a vaginal orgasm with an unaltered partner. Their circumcised partners were more likely to have premature ejaculation. Women were also more likely to state that they had had vaginal discomfort with a circumcised partner either often or occasionally as opposed to rarely or never. More women reported that they never achieved orgasm with circumcised partners than with their unaltered partners. Also, they were more likely to report never having had a multiple orgasm with their circumcised partners. They were also more likely to report never having had a multiple orgasm with their circumcised partners" (source: The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner).
  
  I've put quite a bit of research into circumcision as an uncircumcized male in America. Growing up, I felt a little strange when most boys I knew were circumcized. I got made fun of a few times, but nothing too traumatizing. I was always nervous around women, but I found that it's truly not something that they care about. Both women I've had sex with had never seen an uncircumcized penis (in person) and had quite a few questions about how it works, how it's different, etc. The first girl was a virgin, so she had nothing else to compare it to. The second was not, and she now says that she actually prefers an uncircumcized penis. I asked her about how it looks and she basically said she didn't think any penises were attractive and that the foreskin didn't make it any less attractive. She enjoys the way it feels and is impressed by my stamina in general (and I don't think there's anything that special about me).
  
  As far as hygene is concerned, my parents did not really teach me about proper hygene so I didn't do anything that I was supposed to until I was about 13 or 14 years old. I didn't retract the foreskin when I urinated and I didn't wash regularly. I can also say that I still never got any diseases or had any problems with it. Although research shows there is a slightly higher rate of penile infections, the researchers recommend that it should not affect your decision as it is not a strong enough correlation to justify circumcision.
  
  Across the country in the US, the ways are changing. In the United States in 2003, the circumcision rate was 55.9%. The Western region of the country now had a 31.4% circumcision rate. Many people are now realizing that it's pointless to circumcize children. If they want to get circumcized, give them that decision since it can't be undone. My very long two cents. -Cyb

  By  Anonymous, at 12/13/2005 10:03:00 PM  

  ---

• Hey now...circ'ed penises are way more attractive-looking. And if you call that a "mutilation", you psycho hippies, then I guess piercings and tattoos are mutilations too. Get over it. If you're so concerned, buy fake foreskins and give them to your Jewish friends for Christmas. You heard me.

  By  Kelly Dawn, at 12/13/2005 11:46:00 PM  

  ---

• I can't believe you guys have never heard of smegma. It's the dick cheese that collects under a foreskin. True, I've never seen an uncircumcised penis, but I like mine nice and trim. Oh, and just for the record, that last Jew bashing prick can go to hell, and I'd be more than happy to send you there. If you want someone to hate on, hate people who can't think for themselves enough not to mindlessly hate others. And no, I'm not jewish, I'm actually a vampire.
  
  Racists are yummy. >:)

  By  Anonymous, at 12/14/2005 01:10:00 AM  

  ---

• I'd buy one just to try it if it wasn't so ridiculously priced. Hell, if they were $10-20 I bet they could sell far more.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/14/2005 02:03:00 AM  

  ---

• Arguing on the internet is like competing in the Special Olympics,,, even if you win, you are still retarded.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/14/2005 02:46:00 AM  

  ---

• you know why jews were circumsized originally? after moses set them free, they wandered round a desert for 40 years...didnt want to get sand in there now would you?...

  By  Anonymous, at 12/14/2005 05:02:00 AM  

  ---

• this is a little out of controll aint it. its all about preference. anyway your dick looks bigger with it haha and the actual reason for it is to keep your bell end clean and infection free. everything is their for a reason it all has a purpose or we wouldn't have it would we

  By  Anonymous, at 12/14/2005 05:49:00 AM  

  ---

• Piercings and Tattoos are mutilation depending on who you ask. But that's different you're not removing a part of your body that serves a purpose just for cosmetic reasons. And don't say it doesn't serve a purpose because it does, it protects the head of the penis. The reason people say sex is better with a foreskin is because they've done studies, they ask people who have had a circumcision later in life, so I guess they would know. Also when you stop protecting the head it has to heal itself from all the chafing against fabrics, so the healed tissue is thicker, and therefore less sensitive. Not that any of this matters, because no one is going to post on here, oh yeah, I hate my penis I wish it was different.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/14/2005 07:35:00 AM  

  ---

• 2 : to cut off or permanently destroy a limb or essential part of
  
  Since when is foreskin a "limb" or "essential"? Circumcision doesn't sound like mutilation to me!

  By  Anonymous, at 12/14/2005 08:06:00 AM  

  ---

• At no point in your rambling, incoherent response was there anything that could even be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul!

  By  dr1000101, at 12/14/2005 08:26:00 AM  

  ---

• cock in a sock!

  By  Anonymous, at 12/14/2005 08:57:00 AM  

  ---

• WHY ARE JEWISH MEN CIRCUMSIZED??
  
  
  
  BECAUSE THE WOMEN LOVES EVERYTHING THEY GET HALF OFF!!
  
  
  HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  By  Anonymous, at 12/14/2005 09:49:00 AM  

  ---

• Err.. I don't even think an Olympic Wanker would have that big foreskin.. :S the only good thing with the foreskin is that it protects your glans from feeling strange in the underpants... if you're circumsized maybe your glans isn't as sensitive as ours, because if I touch stuff with my glans it feels really awkward.. but ok.. I'll just cut my dick off and use an electric sock cause that's how I'm born

  By  Anonymous, at 12/14/2005 03:26:00 PM  

  ---

• im a girl, and ive seen em both ways...honestly, i prefer my uncircumcised partner because he can actually feel what im doing to him, my last partner had little to no sensation on the tip of his penis due to circumcision. So i say leave em alone, but having rubber foreskin is a little creepy. By the way, stop picking on the Jewish guy, if he wants to mess up his penis, that's his problem :D

  By  Anonymous, at 12/14/2005 04:06:00 PM  

  ---

• It's not instinct to cut off some penis skin, so why do we do it. I personally like my foreskin flappin in the wind. It's pretty sweet. I think i will peirce it and put a ring through it.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/14/2005 08:59:00 PM  

  ---

• I have no problem with foreskin. I'm circumsized. I live in America. Every girl I've had sex with has said they're glad I'm circumcized. I seem to enjoy sex a damn lot, so who the hell cares. Plus I watch that video and see the whole foreskin thing and all I can think about is dogs and "Red Rocket".... damn you South Park

  By  Anonymous, at 12/15/2005 12:29:00 AM  

  ---

• Are theye edible? I ate my 1st husbands right off & miss the taste of chicken with spew! Let me know, I'm dying to find out.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/15/2005 09:59:00 AM  

  ---

• Sixty percent of Americans are circumcized. Eighty percent of all males in the world are NOT circumcized. As a result, cut American men have to villify uncut men. You would not believe the BS cut Americans tell themselves about what it's like having a foreskin. If you were to believe them you'd think that having a foreskin meant having to shower every 15 minutes. There seems to be a great deal of deep seated rage amongst cut men. The term for it is "circumcision rage".
  
  If I don't wash my pussy for a week bacteria builds up.
  Should I:
  a. learn to wash
  b. cut my pussy lips off
  
  If I don't wash my ears for a week wax builds up.
  Should I:
  a. learn to wash
  b. cut them off
  
  If I don't wash my face for a day or two this sticky glue builds up in my
  eyelids?
  Should I:
  a. learn to wash
  b. cut them off
  
  If I don't was my feet for a week toe jam appears.
  Should I:
  a. learn to wash
  b. cut them off
  
  If I don't wash my dickey for a week some smell may appear.
  Should I:
  a. learn to wash
  b. cut my weewee's best part off

  By  Anonymous, at 12/15/2005 12:46:00 PM  

  ---

• The American male is the only mammal that requires immediate corrective surgery at birth.
  
  Americans have bought into the troll hook, line, and sinker. What troll, you ask? The troll started by the wingnut Dr Kellogg who recommended circumcision as a means of desensitizing the penis in order to reduce masturbation. He also wanted the clitoris burned out with acid but that one didn't catch on. Google "Kellogg, circumcision" for the story.
  
  Every couple expecting a son questions circumcision. But many still do it in the end out of a cowardice. They are afraid that their son will be tormented by the mutilated in the locker room.
  
  Great reason to perpetuate this idiotic practice.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/15/2005 01:10:00 PM  

  ---

• whos cares about your penis....i dont......so why dont you calm down about it, it is proven that the unremoved foreskin have billions of more bacteria cells in, and under the flap of skin. yeah im circumsized and i personally would rather have it circumsized, first oof because i can get a better job in the porn buissness. seacrest out, bitches.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/15/2005 05:01:00 PM  

  ---

• oh yeah.. i forgot to put the benifets of circumcision
  
  1. it prevents penile cancer
  
  2.it prevents hiv/aids!!!
  
  3.it prevents stds!!!
  
  4.it prevents urinary track infections
  5.just cause your mad that your dick looks weird doesnt mean you should get angry
  6.whoever posted the comment about, just cause (body part here)is dirty i should
  1. clean it
  2.cut it off
  is a fuckin idiot!
  removing the foreskin is proven to have signifigant health benifents!!!
  so why dont you stupid english, stop hatin on americans and jews and get a fuckin life!!
  
  seacrest out, bitches.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/15/2005 05:14:00 PM  

  ---

• Replace my foreskin?? What on earth would i want to do that for? It's much nicer looking, more higenic, cleaner, and i know for a fact that most women much much prefer a circumcised penis!! And what was that absolute crap about 'dryness and chafing caused by constant exposure to and rubbing against clothes'? Do you actually have a clue what you are talking about????

  By  Anonymous, at 12/16/2005 05:21:00 AM  

  ---

• A little small isn't it?

  By  Kane, at 12/16/2005 05:28:00 AM  

  ---

• "it prevents hiv/aids"
  
  Ha ha, only gullible americans can believe that bullshit.
  
  American women prefer circumcised men because most men are like that but the rest of the world don't give a shit about it.

  By  Me, at 12/16/2005 05:45:00 AM  

  ---

• I feel sorry for the circumsized men.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/16/2005 08:29:00 AM  

  ---

• umm. I think most of the arguements here are retarded but since I am a little sleep deprived and my brain isn't working anyway I thought I would throw in my two cents. I am a uncircumcised Canadian with a circumcised brother and to my understanding it really doesn't make any significant difference to anyone whether or not they were circumsized. Sex is fun. you will get infections if you don't clean, whether or not you are circumsized. read the research, people! BEING CIRCUMSIZED DOES NOT PREVENT HIV/AIDS OR STDs (the retard that believes that deserves what he gets). I am, however, under the opinion that if someone wants to be circumcised it should be their choice to make when they are an adult and competent to do so (as do people who get tattoos, etc). As an atheist I cannot see why parents are allowed to perform genital mutilation on their children in order to conform to superstitious bullshit (jew, catholic, islamic, whatever). The important thing is that someone came up with this ridiculous product and this should give everyone a good laugh!

  By  Anonymous, at 12/16/2005 12:11:00 PM  

  ---

• I think the Final Solution is to find out if it will survive the oven.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/16/2005 12:24:00 PM  

  ---

• Why in the name of god would we want that?

  By  Anonymous, at 12/16/2005 01:03:00 PM  

  ---

• Right first of all it's not just religeous reasons that people have to have this operation performed. Unfortunately i could'nt piss in a potty. Unfortunate, yes but in the past i may have been left with half a dick. My girlfriend does believe in the smeg thing, but we still have to clean. It is still a warm moist place. THINK ABOUT IT. I feel that if it's not broken dont try to fix it. Religeon is hard to comment on because its about beliefs. However female circumcision does baffle me.

  By  th0mh0, at 12/16/2005 01:08:00 PM  

  ---

• This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

  By  th0mh0, at 12/16/2005 01:18:00 PM  

  ---

• I much prefer sucking a cock that doesn't have a foreskin, much tastier.

  By  angelina, at 12/16/2005 01:36:00 PM  

  ---

• There are a lot of very sad anti-Semitic racists in here aren’t there, how about you just try, and respect people, there religion and tradition, you can have your opinion, that’s fine but don’t express it if it could be considered to be offensive, simple as, it amazes me that there are some men who are obsessed with willies, its really rather immature. A cock is a cock, if you have a foreskin; I hope that you wash under it just as I hope that if you do not have a foreskin you wash it anyway, I would hope that you all have that basic level of hygiene. By the way, I really cannot tell the difference, if a guy has or does not have his foreskin but I do find that those with out are not still competing with other men as if they where still in school over which one of them has the best penis, how much sex do you lads all get anyway? Loose some testosterone and gain some respect.
  Thanks.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/16/2005 02:11:00 PM  

  ---

• being circumsized is good if you have no arms or are simply too retarted to wash your cock.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/16/2005 04:55:00 PM  

  ---

• I'm not circumcized. I feel badly for the guys that are, wish they knew what they're missing. If I want to know what it's like to be circumsized, I can just pull the foreskin back and secure it there for a couple days... the head of the penis toughens up... sensitivity goes down, really not an optimal situation.
  
  In all honestly, smegma (that creamy white stuff that builds up) only shows up if you don't wash your penis for 3-4 days or more. Any girl that meets a guy with smegma can let him know he's dirty, unless he's camping in antarctica and can't clean or something.
  
  And I made it through school without being teased once. If anything other guys were fascinated and asked questions like 'does it make it feel better?' 'do girls like that it looks bigger?'. If anything I felt like I had the advantage.
  
  All in all, it should be the childs decision what they do to their body. If they hit the age of 18 and say "Hey... I think my penis is too sensitive, and the skin just isn't hard and thick enough. Oh and.. I think I'm going to require myself to use oils and lubricants when I masturbate... because that process just needs more complications." If any 18 year old says that.. he's free to chop off parts of his penis in my book :)
  
  Speaking of which... this is something I've always wondered... all this talk of baby oil or vaseline when masturbating... I'm guessing that's because circumsized men don't have the foreskin to produce that sliding effect... so they have to lube up otherwise they chafe their penis?... MAN THAT SUCKS. Maybe i'm missing something... but if circumsized guys only have the option of that one kind of masturbation where you have to lube up...that's a seriously crappy situation.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/16/2005 05:11:00 PM  

  ---

• ok, this is it, im a circumcised MUSLIM, as most of us are, i dont give a shit about not having a seedy looking flap of skin on the end of my wang, and for all of you who said that it wouldnt be there if it didnt have a purpose, think about the appendix, IT HAS NO GODDAM USE BUT ITS STILL THERE!!! and for all those uncut men who seem to find it there business to decredit a very old religious tradition, you should think about it, why the hell do u care what other people do to there PRIVATE parts, their called that cos they are, stay out of our crotches,
  
  Peace out mother fuckers

  By  Anonymous, at 12/16/2005 06:40:00 PM  

  ---

• whoever says we have everything for a reason-
  we got an appendix and we sure as hell dont need that.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/16/2005 07:00:00 PM  

  ---

• ok people, there are medical reasons for people having foreskins removed as a child, in my case it didnt grow with the rest of me causing pain and obviously the inability to urinate, so off it went (which is a good thing obviously) i dont however 20 years later feel the need to go out and buy a fake one, i think after 20 years of toughening up the skin wont be hypersensitive again anyway so why bother, also why are you lot all so bloody argumentative, some have foreskins some dont get over it, people are different, its only ythe insecure that would buy 1 of these things anyway and im in total agremenet with the appendix comment above, maybe we could make artificial appendices for those who had them removed so they dont feel so empty with you lot hounding them for their 'imperfections' and 'mutilations'
  
  GET OVER IT

  By  Anonymous, at 12/16/2005 07:13:00 PM  

  ---

• Foreskins are fun! I love them :) So much more sensual to play with.
  
  Circumcised penises are missing something nice, it's a good job that most circ'd men don't realise what they and their partners are lacking, there would be lawsuits all over the place.
  
  Yeah, just about everyone in England has one except for Jews and Muslims.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/17/2005 12:23:00 PM  

  ---

• Listen Jerks, first of all, I didn't circumcise myself. I was EIGHT FUCKING DAYS OLD! In Judaism there is a person called a mohel, a highly trained, and very strictly religious person who does it for us. First, we're given a sip of wine, so that we can't feel anything. Seriously, look up the bris online. And to all you sick anti-semites with your Jewish jokes, go find your own white-supremist BBS. Come on people, I meant no offense, and I certainly didn't intend to create the hoopla that I did. I'm sorry. Oh, and by the way, not only am I Jewish, but I'm American, so fuck off with all the anti-American jokes too.
  
  LDA

  By  Captain Lumpy Dog, at 12/17/2005 02:25:00 PM  

  ---

• Why is it okay for you to insult uncircumcised men by calling their bodies nasty and dirty, but when someone argues for leaving little boys' bodies intact, it's offensive and insulting?
  
  You know, it's traditional in some cultures to mutilate the genitalia of little girls, too, by cutting of their clitorises and ruining their sex lives and taking away their autonomy and their choice. Maybe that's not a direct analogy here, but your cultural relativism doesn't really work in that case, does it? Just because something is a tradition doesn't make it right. You're going to have to come up with something that directly relates to the actual criticisms: that circumcision takes away bodily autonomy and choice. Can you refute those points without pulling out "tradition"?

  By  Anonymous, at 12/17/2005 06:50:00 PM  

  ---

• Very well said. Unfortunately, I cannot cite anything other than the fact the that while he was in his nineties, Abraham was instructed by the Almighty to circumcise himself. Unlikely as this sounds, it has been this way for almost 6000 years. I'm sorry if I was a jerk, but I just can't stand anti-semitism in any of its forms. I know England has not been the most Jew friendly nation (Hell, we were banned from the island for almost five hundred years), but you're right. Ironically, in the unlikely event that someone would convert to Judaism, one wouldn't even have to fully circumcise themselves. All one needs is to draw a single drop of blood, and that counts as a bris. As to the "nasty" comment, the first time I ever saw a foreskin was when I swam competitively, and one of my team mates was changing. I had no idea what it was. What it really comes down to is what you're used to. Again, I sincerely appologize for my foul languange and my pontificating, but I'm very proud of my heritage, and I'm willing to defend it tooth and nail. Finally, of all the responses to my post, I have to say yours, number 70 deserves the most respect. Thank you for your eloquence and dignity.
  
  Cheers,
  CLDA!

  By  Captain Lumpy Dog, at 12/17/2005 11:15:00 PM  

  ---

• For those of you that think it's better to be cut to prevent STD, cancer, and the like there are many medical danger to getting cut.
  "The quantity of blood loss that might kill an infant (85ml) is easily concealed in today’s highly absorbent disposable diaper. Many newborns, and especially premature infants, weigh much less and a smaller amount of blood loss would be sufficient to trigger hypovolemic shock in those infants. Circumcision of infants, therefore, carries the inherent danger of hypovolemic shock and death."
  "In Finland, fewer than one man in a thousand is circumcised, yet the incidence of penile cancer in Finnish men is less than in Americans. Finnish women also have less cancer of the cervix than American women."
  "In this country anesthetics are rarely used. The infant struggles and screams, and often vomits and defecates, before lapsing into unconsciousness."
  "In England and Wales, however, it is known that an average of 16 children died annually from 1942 to 1947 as a direct result of circumcision."
  "Dr. Weiss mentions these other possible complications: sepsis, eczema of the glans and meatus, meatal stenosis, surgical adhesions, interference with nutrition, edema of local tissue, seepage of blood with resulting anemia, and injuries of the glans or scrotal skin Dr. Weiss mentions these other possible complications: sepsis, eczema of the glans and meatus, meatal stenosis, surgical adhesions, interference with nutrition, edema of local tissue, seepage of blood with resulting anemia, and injuries of the glans or scrotal skin."
  To me the risks outway any benifits. When I have a child he will be uncut untill he can decide for himself.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/17/2005 11:32:00 PM  

  ---

• Dear Captain Lumpy Dog,
  
  I have to take issue with your post. Jews may have been banned in England for 500 years but that was between the 11th and 16th centuries, 400 YEARS AGO. I know some people bear grudges, but don't you think that it might be time to let go of that particular one?
  
  You see racism goes both ways, the English have got a proud heritage of providing refuge for all kinds of migrants from the hugenots onwards, who have helped to shape the cultural mix that is currently living here. I personally am sick of people dissing my culture (yes, the English have one too), and it really doesn't help their case any to be pulling up atrocities from hundreds of years ago, with which to beat today's population. (And I said the same thing to a Welsh person who was trying to blame todays population for the atrocities that King John inflicted on them nearly 800 years ago).
  
  If you think Jews have been treated badly here, you should look back in history and see what happened to them in other countries in the same time frame.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/18/2005 02:31:00 AM  

  ---

• Not getting one, I'm circumsised for medical reasons and if I made my will more sensitive the missus would leave me. I mean I can't believe she thinks twelve seconds is too quick.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/18/2005 03:14:00 AM  

  ---

• The sensitivity thing is about depth of feeling and control. Men with foreskins have much more feeling and a better ability to control themselves, well that's the comment I've heard from many men who have restored anyway.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/18/2005 04:22:00 AM  

  ---

• This make one wonder exactly how much damage should one person be able to inflict on a non-consenting person in the name of "religion". Obviously, it's illegal to inflict such damage on a girl, but you can do whatever you want to a boy... assuming you get him a little drunk, first.
  
  I think the product is a great idea, but hopefully, it will become obsolete when it is also illegal to subject boys to unnecessary human genital modification.

  By  smt, at 12/18/2005 06:49:00 AM  

  ---

• #70 checking in again - thanks, CLDA, for your response. I just want to clarify that while I've obviously got some anti-circumcision feelings, I am not at all anti-semitic, and I am really grossed out that the thread turned that way so quickly. I asked you to address my points without talking about tradition, and I think it's well beyond reasonable to ask everyone else to make their own points without falling back on bigotry.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/18/2005 07:13:00 AM  

  ---

• i'm not a guy so my comment may seen irrelavent, but w/ my experiance the one guy that i was w/ that was still "all natural" wasn't as good sexually. the reason being is he had to stop every few minutes to pull the skin back over the head because it was to sensitive, it was kind of a mood killer. on the other hand it did give me a different sensation which wasn't all bad.... to bad it could've been more consistant. that's just my opinion.
  star

  By  star, at 12/18/2005 01:44:00 PM  

  ---

• Cicumcised males are more likely to participate in risk sexual behavior like anal sex--you're not gay, you're not gay, but having it cut's gonna turn you gay
  
  one in hundred babies die of circumcision
  one in 107 men get penile cancer
  
  Americans suck at math, mohels suck little bleeding dicks and give them herpes
  
  americans cut, americans have the highest rates of sexually transmitted disease in the world, you go, assclowns!

  By  Mutilated, at 12/18/2005 10:02:00 PM  

  ---

• not anti-semitic, but religious rituals suck if they kill babies
  
  MSNBC staff and news service reports
  Updated: 11:50 a.m. ET Feb. 2, 2005
  City health officials are investigating the death of a baby boy who was one of three infants to contract herpes after a rabbi circumcised them.
  
  Ten days after Rabbi Yitzhok Fischer performed religious circumcisions on twins last October, one died of herpes and the other tested positive for the virus, according to a complaint filed by the health department in Manhattan Supreme Court.
  
  The complaint, reported in Wednesday’s edition of the New York Daily News, also said health officials later found a third baby who had contracted herpes after being circumcised by Fischer in late 2003.

  By  to lumpy dog, at 12/18/2005 10:06:00 PM  

  ---

• Botched circumcision kills boys
  
  Chris McGreal in Johannesburg
  Four boys have died and about 100 have been admitted to hospital after botched circumcision ceremonies in south Africa.
  
  Doctors have blamed "traditional surgeons" who use the same blade to circumcise dozens of teenage boys at a time as part of ancient Xhosa rites of passage in Transkei.
  
  The children either bled to death or died from infections. Some of those in hospital are in a critical condition.
  
  Initiates have also complained of traditional surgeons who are drunk or high on cannabis during the cutting ceremony. Health workers have long warned against traditional methods of circumcision, in part because repeated use of the same blade will spread Aids and hepatitis.
  
  Infections are also caused when bandages used to control bleeding are tied too tight.
  
  The health ministry has threatened to prosecute traditional surgeons who fail to maintain good hygiene but with little effect.
  
  Ten boys died during similar ceremonies in the middle of last year. Families typically pay 200 Rand (£ 20) for a traditional surgeon and attendants at the ceremony. Most Xhosa are too poor to pay for a hospital circumcision.
  
  Medic Explains Circumcision Deaths
  
  By Standard Reporter
  Nairobi
  
  Ninety per cent of youths who die after undergoing circumcision suffer from undetected bleeding disorders, the chairman of Kenya Haemophilia Association, Dr Walter Mwanda, has announced.
  
  Mwanda said these children suffer from haemophilia and die due to lack of early detection of the condition which leads to their bleeding to death.
  
  He was speaking during a training for medical practitioners involved in haemophilic-related disorders lectured by the World Federation of Haemophilia(WFH),Kenya Haemophilic Association and Kenyatta National Hospital. WFH Vice-President, Mr Paul Giangrande said Africa needed to know the implications of having a child with the disorder and what medics have to do for its treatment and survival.
  
  Circumcision kills one, another serious
  Saturday, February 12,2005
  BANKE: Muyoddin Khan, 5-year-old son of Rahamadtulla of Indrapur-5, died on Thursday while another son, Santalat, 7, has been admitted to Bheri Zonal Hospital due to excess bleeding after they were circumcised on the same day. "We carried out circumcision on the boys as part of our religion, but the bleeding did not stop," said Rahamadtulla.
  He had also lost his eldest son in a similar incident five years ago. According to him, another 7-month-old son has to undergo the same ritual. "I can’t go against our religion although I’ve lost two of my sons," he said.According to doctors, Santalat is in serious condition.
  
  "Surgery ends in coma; wife gets $3.85 million" Trenton, N.J. (UPI) "A $3.85 million out-of-court settlement was awarded to the wife of a man who has been in a coma since a circumcision operation four years ago." [Source?]
  
  "Botched Circumcision wants to meet man who likes headless cocks. Also, want to meet man with headless cock." (From a classified ad in Foreskin Quarterly.)
  
  "Surgery ends in coma; wife gets $3.85 million" Trenton, N.J. (UPI) "A $3.85 million out-of-court settlement was awarded to the wife of a man who has been in a coma since a circumcision operation four years ago." [Source?]
  
  "Botched Circumcision wants to meet man who likes headless cocks. Also, want to meet man with headless cock." (From a classified ad in Foreskin Quarterly.)
  
  "MD sued for cutting short man's sex life" Ottawa Citizen, 3/4/88. "TORONTO (CP) A couple is suing a doctor claiming a circumcision he performed left the man unable to have sex ... The couple, from Hamilton, say the 1984 operation excessively foreshortened the man's penis and left him unable to achieve an erection or ejaculate."

  By  slash & burn politics, at 12/18/2005 10:50:00 PM  

  ---

• For any who said that the appendix was useless think back to tonsils, they were often cut out due to "infection" but it was later found out that the tonsils are part of the lymphatic system and swell/change color in responce to illness within a person. Just because an appendix has no apparent purpose dosen't mean that it dosen't do anything, it just means people are too shortsighted to be assed to figure it out.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/19/2005 11:12:00 AM  

  ---

• Unknown--
  
  As a matter of fact, I'm one of the few Americans I can think of who not only respects English culture, but I actually love English food! I understand that my time frame may have been off, but I would like to make an offer to close the Circumcise / Don't Circumcise argument by getting back to the original topic at hand: Why in the name of Almighty Bread Pudding would a company create an artificial foreskin? Can we just get back to the topic at hand. I know there are some powerful arguments both ways, and ironically, I wrote a ten page essay in grade six about circucision in Africa, and I have to say, female circumcision is perhaps one of the cruelest acts one can commit. While male circumcision may or may not have medical benefits, female circumcision serves no purpose other than torturing the girl. In closing, let's all agree to disagree, and try to be friends. Again, if I offended anyone, I'm painfully sorry. That was as far from my intention as is physically (literally??) possible.
  We're all civilized people, even the bigots, and we should all act that way, myself included. I'll be the first to admit that I have some very strong personal prejudices (I won't go into them, as I feel they're private, not to mention the fact that I don't wish to alienate myself from the group even further.)
  
  You know what they always used to say:
  
  "Come on get happy!!!"
  
  Cheers,
  Captain Lumpy Dog

  By  n Lumpy Dog, at 12/19/2005 08:36:00 PM  

  ---

• HAHA!!
  people are retarded to turn this into some dumb religious issue.
  ITS FAKE FORESKIN!!!
  getting all defensive about your tool online is hilarious.
  jeez ppl, get over yourselves.
  if it was cheaper, i'd try it for fun.
  or a joke.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/20/2005 08:41:00 AM  

  ---

• The utter ignorance through hate and discrimination.
  
  Woman say they love foreskin, or that they hate it, I haven't heard, or experienced a woman who was dead set on one preference. If there are some, it may be due to experiences, we sexually tend to like or dislike things based on psychological preference, and not so much if it actually does feel better, or even contributes to a better sensation.
  
  As to men arguing, I'm cut, but my relatives are uncut, this stems from me being a mutt, and having a gamut of different relatives, and I can tell ya, I haven't heard any different stories from cut men, than from uncut men. Sharing stories with other male relatives, it comes out to be, it really doesn't make a difference, it's just preference.
  
  heres some points, pros and cons.
  
  Uncut:
  You have to make sure when you haven't showered, or have been exposed to extended circumstance, to make sure the foreskin is cleaned. like any crease of skin, it may get sore or inflammed, this is normal and happens, nothing for people to use as an argument, as balls can get this way too, due to the creases and folds when loose.
  I've heard and seen photos of foreskin mishaps when rough sex occurs, where tears in the foreskin can appear, this is natural as the skin is very thin and any part of the body can be affected like this.
  lastly some woman feel having a foreskin adds to the pleasure as the skin seems to "slide" around inside them, while they have the sensation of the penis still sliding almost independently inside of them. (sort of like the sensation of a severly internally lubbed condom)
  
  
  Cut:
  It is a fallacy that the sensation is deadened, as the nominal tolerance and feeling threshold of nerves differ with each and every person. In fact the sensation is the same if not equally as much to provide pleasure for the male.
  The skin chaffing is less apparent than one would think, as if a cut penis chaffs, then the foreskin on an uncut penis would chaff as well.
  The look of the penis is changed into a "cleaner" look as defined by most the medical community, but most woman overseas as well as from cultures that do no circumsize, see it as strange, and will sometimes not sleep with cut males.
  
  ---
  
  I mean, really, does it matter? cut or uncut. IT'S A PENIS, and it functions the same either way, the sensations are the same, the penetration is the same.
  
  the foreskin is a evolutionary leftover that in future generations will begin becoming smaller as we no longer have fur that the foreskin would need to protect the glans. Due to this, you will run into more and more people just preferring uncut people because generally speaking, it'll just fade with generations. Like the man who mentioned a tight foreskin, this happens, and sometimes can cause erectile and urinary complications, and the only fix is circumcision or other types of penile surgery.
  
  I hope all woman keep an open mind, cut or uncut, it all depends on the man, and your personal preferences, and not just the media or social ideals.

  By  Some Guy, at 12/20/2005 11:41:00 AM  

  ---

• I can't believe this turned into a huge religious argument! It doesn't matter as much as many of you think. I totally agree with the previous post, well stated! A penis is a penis whether or not it has a foreskin, there are pros and cons for both sides.
  I am a circumsized guy and I wish my parents would have let me make that decision for myself. That's just my 2 cents, peace out everyone

  By  Anonymous, at 12/20/2005 12:38:00 PM  

  ---

• HOORAY!!!!!!
  
  
  *does happy dance*
  
  The argument is finally over. I'm going to leave you guys with a modified line from one of my favorite Dr. Seuss books: "A penis is a penis no matter how small."
  
  I'm really happy to see that we all came to our senses and ended the flame war. Way to be mature guys! And they say that all comment posts have the maturity of a two year old.
  
  Peace and Chicken Grease
  Captain Lumpy Dog Away!

  By  Captain Lumpy Dog, at 12/20/2005 03:26:00 PM  

  ---

• I'm from Scandinavia where all infant/child circumcisions(both male&female)are concidered act of violence towards children and not practised at all.
  Don't want to get into a debate but just wondering aren't there any education about genitals in American schools - or where on earth do people get these ideas that foreskins are dangerous or dirty? Foreskin and frenulum are there for a reason and at least here men would be horrified if you suggested that they cut part of their genitals(or their sons' genitals) as horrified as if you suggested to women that they cut part of their genitals(or their daughters').
  Here men don't need circumcision later in life, foreskin doesn't cause problems. I'm all very confused.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/20/2005 11:54:00 PM  

  ---

• Being cut myself I have been able to stretch the skin back to completely cover the head of my penis.
  
  I think this is a completely viable option for those who wish to protect the glans of their willies !
  
  The cost appears to be very high, but to each their own !

  By  Anonymous, at 12/22/2005 09:54:00 AM  

  ---

• want to know why jewish men is circumsized??

  By  Anonymous, at 12/22/2005 11:01:00 AM  

  ---

• because the jewish women likes everything half off!!

  By  Anonymous, at 12/22/2005 11:01:00 AM  

  ---

• since the heads of muslim women is covered...they rather the other heads of the men are not! hahaha

  By  Anonymous, at 12/22/2005 11:02:00 AM  

  ---

• you know why alot of poor people aint circumsized?? hahahaha cuz the mama wanna leave the hospital without having to pay for a p[iece of skin cut off!! hahahahahaha

  By  Anonymous, at 12/22/2005 11:03:00 AM  

  ---

• as that is beautiful to know that one has again the foreskin :D

  By  Anonymous, at 12/24/2005 03:41:00 AM  

  ---

• most of you all say is wrong
  
  I was circumcised when I was 18. I can assure you sex is great before and afterwards.
  
  Generally, women I have dated prefer a cut cock- for both sex and oral sex. you do lose some sensitivity but on the bright side - sex lasts longer - from a blokes perspective is this a good thing???!!!
  
  Most of Americans, Canadians, Aussies and New Zealanders are all cut and where I grew up (north london) it must be close to 50:50 what with all the jewish and muslem folk (some of whom are good freinds of mine - so please leave out all the racist stuff). Also, africans cut their kids at adulthood as do many people in asia.
  
  Regarding sensitivity, it depends on how you are cut - what method - what device. By removing outer foreskin, the sensitivity is actually improved. By removing inner foreskin the sensitivity is reduced. It also depends on whether the cut is tight or loose - must cuts in the UK are loose, most cuts in the US are tight. A jewish cut si somewhere in between. In a tight, high cut, there is little shaft skin movement and the circ scar is near the scrotum. In a tight low cut, the cut scar is near the glans. In a loose high cut the scar is still near the scrotum but there is more movement of the shaft skin. In a loose, low cut the scar is near the glans and there is shaft movement. Most UK cuts are loose and low because they are done freehand using essentially a pair of scissors.
  
  Almost finally - the appendix is actually pretty good at helping digesting green veg so it is not entirely redundant.
  
  So finally, and most important - what do I prefer 5 years later.... Well actually, I really like being cut - it looks nicer (in my view), it is cleaner, I can masturbate and have sex for longer, my girlfriend prefers it, and statistically, there is a lower chance of me getting the HPV virus, HIV or my partners getting cervical cancer.
  
  how do I know so much about the procedure- I am a urologist.
  
  why did I get cut - foreskin wouldn't go back over my glans (helmet) so I had it removed. There are many others ways to relieve this problem but these other methods increase the risk of getting the foreskin stuck behind the glans with an erection and not being able to get it back into its normal position. This is a very nasty consequence requiring emergeny medical treatment.
  
  My semi-expert opinion (have not seen or used one) on the artificial retractable foreskin - what a load of bo***cks.

  By  Anonymous, at 12/27/2005 01:58:00 PM  

  ---

• Wow cool this looks wicked I think I'll get one. I wish I saw this sooner I wonder if us youngesters can wear it or do I have to wait till I finish puberty :P, The sooner the better I think. I'll say that circumsion ok if u agree to it but circumsing us kids when were babies just aint rite especialliy over some dumb 200,000 year old ancient ritual

  By  Taz, at 12/29/2005 12:57:00 AM  

  ---

• I am a British jew and circumcised at birth. How any jew can say foreskin is not nice seems a little strange to me as they have never had one. For religious jews I think its fair enough to continue with a tradition they believe in so strongly. As most of my partners are not jews sometimes I would like to have a foreskin as it is the norm in this country, or just to see what it feels like with the bits god wanted me to have!!

  By  Jon, at 12/31/2005 07:09:00 AM  

  ---

• I am a British jew and circumcised at birth. How any jew can say foreskin is not nice seems a little strange to me as they have never had one. For religious jews I think its fair enough to continue with a tradition they believe in so strongly. As most of my partners are not jews sometimes I would like to have a foreskin as it is the norm in this country, or just to see what it feels like with the bits god wanted me to have!! greensky2005@hotmail.co.uk

  By  Jon, at 12/31/2005 07:10:00 AM  

  ---

• Haha, given a sip of wine before getting your dick sliced up? I'll pass. By the way, there are a lot of other fucked up age-old traditions out there that are beginning to be questioned and done away with, get with the times.

  By  Anonymous, at 1/02/2006 11:34:00 AM  

  ---

• This post has been removed by a blog administrator.

  By  Michael Samson, at 1/06/2006 09:24:00 AM  

  ---

• Well, I just finished reading all the posts in this forum and I must say there are a lot of good points here, as well as a lot of bad points. None the less, I would like to say what I feel is really at the heart of this issue. Just so you all know, I am an American male, and was raised in a Jewish home, and yes, I am circumcised. I have been studying this subject in depth since I was 20 years old (I am 26 now). Before that time, I had never really questioned my circumcised status nor did I know anything about the functions of the foreskin. For me, it was attending the Jewish Bris of a cousin of mine that made me look into this subject. For those of you who are not Jewish and don't know this, a Bris is the traditional ceremony in which Jewish people circumcise a newborn at the age of 8 days old. It is normally performed at home, in front of family and relatives, and the person who does the cutting is called the Mohel.. basically a medically trained religious person.
  
  Anyways, I was horrified at this Bris.. by the fact that the baby was screaming horribly, obviously in agony.. and by the way everyone just kind of watched, ignoring the babies cries.. the baby was not given any pain relief other then a drop of wine, and when all was done, the family had a little party with food. I was horrified by all of this. I came home afterwards with one main question in my mind.. it is the same question that I feel is at the heart of this issue to this day.. it was, "Why did someone else other then me have the right to change my body?". As I said, I have been studying the facts of this issue for years.. there is a lot you can read about this subject, it is complex.. and it goes into many different subject areas, human rights, children's rights, equal protection law, religion, religion vs. individual rights, ethics, medical ethics, history, the list goes on and on.. But after 6 years of reading, countless discussions with family members, friends & strangers.. I have found one universal truth to all of this..
  
  The subject of circumcision is really only about one thing.. personal freedom. I believe that every human being, whether they are male or female deserves an equal right to their body, in its entirety as they were born. Every human being deserves the right to genital integrity and to sovereignty over their own body. Only one person has to live with the results of a circumcision, and that is the owner of the body. No one can deny that circumcision removes the right of choice from the individual. Circumcision is an unnecessary surgery.. every medical organization on the face of the earth has stated this (including the American Medical Association). Any medical points, for or against circumcision are truly besides the point. Conversely, any religious views for or against circumcision are also besides the point. The foreskin belongs to the owner, not to the parents, not to a religion, or to a hospital, and therefore it is unethical to remove it without the owners consent. Forcing this decision onto any person, especially an infant is a crime against their right to their own body. In America there are federal laws that protect females against any alteration of their genitals, it is illegal with no exceptions for religion.. this is because the laws are protecting the owners rights..
  
  My point is.. the fact that these laws do not protect boys as well only shows the prejudice that exists in American society. I was raised in a Jewish home, and I am an American, and I was able to learn about this subject, as difficult as it was for me, I realized what I lost to circumcision... but it wasnt so much my flesh as it was my rights that were lost. Above all, that is what this subject is about. Today I do what I can to teach people about this subject, to raise awareness of this issue, and to teach men about their natural anatomy. Personally, I think that when American men start to learn a little more about the true functions of the foreskin.. fewer and fewer will choose this procedure for their children. It may take generations.. but eventually, the truth will catch on.

  By  Michael Samson, at 1/06/2006 09:30:00 AM  

  ---

• in the talmud, the bible of judaism, basically, the rabbis encourage and promote sodomy between husband and wife as a doctrine of judaism.
  
  Since jews all over the world study the talmud, they also have alot of hetero anal sex which obviously is kind of unnecessary since afterall, she has a vagina, which is a god made hole for your cock.
  
  No wonder they have problems with "STD"s and penile cancer if they don't cut it off. Newsflash if an uncut guy rubbed fecal grease or matter under his foreskin every day for a year he would no doubt have some type of disease by the end of that year.
  
  Since europe which is essentially catholic for the most part (catholic church is against hetero sodomy), they have no need for cutting off their foreskin because it is healthy. JEws need to cut it off because theirs is unhealthy from years of having anal prison style sex with their wife. ANd that is a fact that jews even admit proudly - that they love sodomy with women. Google talmud and anal sex and alot of verses from the talmud will pop up revealing their predeliction toward prison style ass raping their wives (despite her protests) insatiably as being a "good" thing.
  
  MAimonedes the jewish philosopher during medieval times said that "circumcision for jews is done to reduce sexual pleasure - which "bewitches the mind", and to stop women from having pleasure from sex because when they do tehy become attatched to their men and want sex more often, which curbs the mans time for study devoted to God."
  
  CAnadians are not cut. South americans and the european spaniards there are not cut. Only america. That is the only nation that practices it medically. The only other places are in north africa and the middle east (jews and muslims). The jews are responsible for the spreading of circumcision in america, because that is like their second home, which housed more jews than israel until a few years ago. Circumcision is a muted form of ritual human sacrafice that jews believe in. Jews believe in ritual blood sacrafice. That is why every country in europe at one time or another deported them because kids turned up missing and dead in rivers with thirteen stab wounds (saint william of trent was one, whose Legal trial found direct evidence that the jews had murdered him during a ritual sacrafice). 13 is a significant kabbala number as well as in freemasonry (which are reported to dabble in the old human sacrafice... why do you think they wacked stanley kubrick before he completed his movie in the illuminati freemasons - eyes wide shut, which accused the illuminatis of HC).
  
  IF there were no jews in the US, I bet cirmucision would go away. Circ follows wherever the jews are it seems. It only happens in two places... the middle east and adjacent north africa... and the united states.
  
  Obviously to cut up babies in order to affect their sex lives in any way is assinine... unless... it is diabolical... What if you wanted a way to decrease your child from masturbating... decrease his sex life... decrease your own maternal desire to have sex WITH him when you are showing him how to clean under his foreskin in the bathtub when he starts to grow up... because now you won't have to show him at all, and that might decrease incest... and allow him to have all the anal sex he wanted with his wife until he proplapsed her anus if he wanted to... and you wanted to turn away his pleasure from sex and life and to turn it towards... money! and commerce.... circumcision would be the way to do it. HOwever, the only way to do all those horrible things to someone without having them wanting to kill you is to do it before they ever had a chance to find out what they had... before they lost it. And so the jews cut off the baby's forsking at eight days... since he hasn't had sex yet, he will never know what he is missing... and he will never have rage against his parents for doing it... supposedly. It is diabolical. It is stealing from someone before they knew that had it coming. IT is like someone won the lotterry, and you kill the lotto administrator, write your name in as the winner, and take his lotto winnings before she ever announces it, and before the winner ever knows. Teh jews and the americans could do it any time they wanted... why do they pick to do it when the person is a baby. A baby can't object to it. You would think they would just let the child know about the option when they grow up and after tehy have already masturbated and had sex with it.
  
  THe jew on this board seems kind of wacked mentally. First he lashes out at the "nasty gross" sausage smugglers and he takes offense to the term mutilation as being anti-jewish, and then when confronted on his own bullshit, he starts to kiss everyone's ass and crawls into a little hole of self depracation and cowardice and begs everyone to be friends with him. What the hell? HE is one walking argument for not circumcision.
  
  I am circumcised, and there are alot of hard things about being circumcised. I think it should be outlawed for children unless it is medically necessary which hardly ever happens. As for stds and aids... the top ten countries with the highest aids rate are the ten countries of north africa... mainly black people... and coincidentally those are the ten countries with the highest circumcision rates! If circ prevents aids, north africans would all be aids free.
  
  I admit there is a little bit of a pride issue involved with circed men... because being circed and to admit circ is wrong... is thought to somehow lesses your opinion of yourself... since you are circumcised... but if you thought about it logically... like if your finger was cut off at birth, would you cut off your son's finger at birth also? No.
  
  As for the jew on this board he seems to be really stupid and arrogant. He calls one guy anti-semitic (and he probably does not even know what semite means - it means son of shem which biblically and in the dictionary includes all north africans and asians who speak a semitic language either farsi arabic or hebrew or arhamaic. the term semitic and the term "anti-semitic" has nothing per se to do with hebrews at all. It just means any middle eastern person basically, including but not limited to hebrews. The term "antisemitic" was invented in 1930's by a jew. It does not make any sense to use it to mean anti-judaism. After all most of those people who jews consider anti-semitic are followers of the christian religion which was founded by a a whole lot of ... jews, on in particular.
  
  Any time i hear the term anti semite... I think oh god here is a retard who does not know the english language who has never looked up semite in the dictionary. Funny thing is the jews presses the use of the word so much that most dictionaries added the term and included it to mean anti-jew, even though it is a fallacy.
  
  This jew is on the board saying he would like to send the "anti-semitic" person to hell himself. What a hater. As if someone can't make fun of you or dis you without you threatening to kill them!
  
  Typical.

  By  Anonymous, at 1/12/2006 11:50:00 PM  

  ---

• and then the next question would be as to why jews like hetero sodomy/anal sex so much?
  
  interesting.
  
  Let's think about it for a second. What would make a man pass up a perfectly good pussy for a fecal grease laden large intestine?
  
  Why pass up the vagina for the colon?
  
  Hmmm.
  
  In jewish law, the talmud, not to mention the old testament, it is against the LAW and punishable by death (in old days) to have sex with a woman who is either on her peiod on within seven days of her last period. So if a woman starts her period on the fifteeth, ends it seven days or so later, the husband has to wait another seven days at least in order to have vaginal intercourse again for fear that her uncleanness will infect him. What is he to do for those fifteen days? HE can't masturbate according to jewish law because that is also ascribed the death penalty ( see onan... who spilled his seed by hand after coitus interruptus and god killed by god for doing it). He is left with the onl thing left ... the dirty work. HE puts in in her butt, because in jewish law there is no other kosher think to do than to assrape your wife's fecal bacteria ecoli ridden large intestine with the part of your body most susceptible to bacterial infection... your penis... what could be more kosher than that?
  
  Richard nixon said after attending a bohemian grove cult meeting in northern california - what a buch of faggots... I can't even shake hands with anyone from sanfrancisco. Now we know jews have the same issue as gays. They are bacteria ridden since they stick their penis inside the ecoli ridden colons of their wives and tehn they go out into society and shakes people's hands after handling their own penises when pissing. That is sick. If you could not have sex for half of every month... you would go nuts too... then you too might be tempted to put your cock in her intestinal sewer as well.

  By  Anonymous, at 1/13/2006 12:24:00 AM  

  ---

• Well to comment on product, not whether or not you have a forskin,it seems like something that would cause irritation in the long run.I rather not.

  By  Anonymous, at 1/18/2006 12:44:00 PM  

  ---

• AS it says in the new testament regarding the christian doctrine outlawing circumcision and the mosaic law in the church:
  
  To those who are impure, everything is impure, but to those who are pure, everything is pure.
  
  So to any talmudic pharisee out there, you see why some people need circumcision and other satanic rituals, and others, the pure, do not.

  By  Anonymous, at 1/22/2006 03:16:00 AM  

  ---

• No no no. Circumsision is a multi-billion dollar industry in the united states its not done for health or religous resons here it is done for pure greed by doctors and hospitals. then they sell the foreskin to stem cell research labs for more money. So, Its sad, barbaric, greedy, and inhumane. I under stand jewish custom but its still a bit barbaric i mean you arnt cutting peoples fingers off for stealing are you? If you circumsize a woman it is concidered femal genital mutilation and is a hanious crime why is it not called the same for men and treated the same?

  By  Shane, at 1/28/2006 11:18:00 AM  

  ---

• No no no. Circumsision is a multi-billion dollar industry in the united states its not done for health or religous resons here it is done for pure greed by doctors and hospitals. then they sell the foreskin to stem cell research labs for more money. So, Its sad, barbaric, greedy, and inhumane. I under stand jewish custom but its still a bit barbaric i mean you arnt cutting peoples fingers off for stealing are you? If you circumsize a woman it is concidered femal genital mutilation and is a hanious crime why is it not called the same for men and treated the same?

  By  Shane, at 1/28/2006 11:19:00 AM  

  ---

• Well, having been cirumcized recently (against my better judgement), I can tell you there is definitely a loss of sensation.
  
  My foreskin had lot of nerves which could get all excited -- so I now have not only less sensitivity but less to work with.
  
  I would like to have my foreskin back. So I'm buying one of these to try it out.

  By  Anonymous, at 1/28/2006 02:28:00 PM  

  ---

• I dont even have a penis and Im stoked about this shit, wait until i tell all my friends! I'll be the next Puff Daddy!!

  By  bryn unit, at 1/29/2006 12:16:00 PM  

  ---

• Hi, one i was little my penis was attacked and my parents robbed me of my foreskin, and i think that i finally have the opportunity to re-in-act a life with having all of my penis compared to now. I have to admit i ahve tried other things such as sheep skin, suran rap and peanut butter, i hope this will be an improvment

  By  stephen mcdonald, at 1/29/2006 12:21:00 PM  

  ---

• hey maybe this will help get my girl to stop bitching at me all day. FRICKEN SWEET!

  By  Corbin, at 1/29/2006 12:21:00 PM  

  ---

• Hi, i was just woundering, what rhymes with orange, its a fucking mystery

  By  Scooby Doo, at 1/29/2006 12:25:00 PM  

  ---

• I have the clap, AND ITS A FUCKING BITCH!

  By  Rosie O'Donald, at 1/29/2006 12:26:00 PM  

  ---

• thats hot

  By  Paris Hilton, at 1/29/2006 12:27:00 PM  

  ---

• your fired MO FUCKAH!

  By  donald trump, at 1/29/2006 12:27:00 PM  

  ---

• Hahahaha foreskin

  By  Bryn Giroux, at 1/29/2006 12:28:00 PM  

  ---

• Circumcision is a big debate here in America today. A product like this fake foreskin is sacreligious and just plain wrong. Shame on the makers of this blastphemous product.
  
  If circumcision were wrong God would not have commanded us to do it. The very first human Adam was created without a foreskin. He was in fact created from the dust by God to procreate with bare glans. Due to the sin we inherited the foreskin evolved as a way of tempting man to sin in the flesh.
  
  God hath commanded "cut it off" so ye not sin in the flesh. To all of you anti circs who have posted here in God's disobdeience, I will pray for you. The correct path for our male children is to be stripped of our inherited sin. Whether it be a Jewish ceremony Bris Milah, or performed by a doctor. The answer is circumsion, the way God intended it.
  
  God Bless...

  By  Anonymous, at 1/30/2006 12:56:00 AM  

  ---

• I don't like talking about religion cause it's a very complicated subject but to comment on the previous post, here's what Christians have to say, read Acts 15. I'm sorry for the religious reply but I too am a little confused.
  
  I like the idea though of a retractable foreskin. Maybe someday someone will think of a retractable ( ).( )

  By  Anonymous, at 1/30/2006 02:06:00 PM  

  ---

• Being a Jewish female, I have to add to this rediculous yet intreguing argument. How many times have I had an argument with a Catholic friend about a simple everyday thing. But this is just silly. Perhaps circumsicion (or however you spell it) is the dictionary defintion of mutilation, and it may not make sense, like many traditions, but it is still a tradition and is to be followed by Jewish males. Questioning religeon gets people (including me) into trouble. Leave it alone, stop arguing about a most rediculous subject, and get on with your circumsized or un-circumsized life. Okay?

  By  Anonymous, at 2/04/2006 09:26:00 PM  

  ---

• I'm not Jewish, and I'm circumcised, why do people assume you need to be Jewish to be circumcised

  By  Anonymous, at 2/09/2006 08:08:00 PM  

  ---

• A family doctor has been delivering children and performing circumcision on boys for 50 years, he decides to retire.
  As he is cleaning out his office, he comes across a huge jar of formeldahyde and forskins, he had saved hundreds of them.
  He decides not to discard them, instead he takes them to a taxidermists and asks him to create whatever he can with them.
  Three weeks later he visits the taxadermists shop.
  The taxidermist disappears to the backrrom and returns with a wallet.
  The doctor is stunned and said,
  "I bring you hundreds of foreskins and all I get is a wallet?"
  The taxidermists said, "Relax doc, its deceptive, rub it, it turns into a suitcase.

  By  Anonymous, at 2/11/2006 10:14:00 PM  

  ---

• why don't they just use the skin from hot soup like I do? :p

  By  Jamie, at 2/17/2006 11:12:00 AM  

  ---

• I'm a woman and I've been with both. I prefer foreskin except during oral sex. My father had foreskin until he had it removed as an adult for medical reasons and he claims that he prefered sex before the procedure. That's my take on it...

  By  Anonymous, at 2/21/2006 09:45:00 PM  

  ---

• i have a foreskin and my girlfreind loves it, she likes pulling it over the head intil it wrinkles and then she sucks it. shes told me that she dosnt get turned of by smegma either-infact she says the smell turns her on.
  in a way there are loadsa different opinions

  By  Anonymous, at 3/10/2006 11:30:00 AM  

  ---

• I love my foreskin. some of those cut ones look really scary, all scarred and the like. I've seen some that look even like the surgeon burned them as if the skin is melted. gross. I hate to be called UNcut or UNcircumcised, that's a negative. I'm as I was born unmessed with. I'd say the cut boys are INcomplete or even Unattractive! I prefer to say I'm intact or my favourite is CLAD, Complete Like Adam. Who says he was made without that's lunacy. Circumcision of unconcenting babies IS mutilation however you look at it. I'm with the rest of Europe this barbaric practice should be made a crime and banned. As concenting adults do what you like with your cock.

  By  Anonymous, at 3/14/2006 01:48:00 PM  

  ---

• I like to hide things in my foreskin, like; spare change, snack foods, cell phones, keys, sometimes drugs, extra pens, really anything that I can't fit into my pockets.

  By  Anonymous, at 3/15/2006 09:02:00 PM  

  ---

• I love my man purse

  By  Anonymous, at 3/15/2006 09:05:00 PM  

  ---

• Foreskin was meant as a protective covering for the penis so that if you are eating pizza naked and hot pizza sauce falls on it, it won't hurt as much. Foreskin is also helpful in protecting the penis by sheilding the rough and bristle like pubic hairs of unshaven women. Foreskin also helps prevent infection when you are Dripping white-hot coconuts from the veiny palm tree of lust or even when you are Putting A Little Mayo On the Knuckle Sandwich.

  By  Anonymous, at 3/15/2006 09:29:00 PM  

  ---

• Mohel asks Rockland to lift ban on oral circumcision
  By STEVE LIEBERMAN
  THE JOURNAL NEWS
  (Original Publication: September 4, 2005)
  
  Rockland's health commissioner is awaiting the state's advice on whether to lift an order banning a Monsey rabbi from performing oral-suction circumcisions in the county.
  
  The order against Rabbi Yitzchok Fischer, 57, was issued after three New York City infants contracted herpes. One of them died.
  
  The New York State Health Department already has lifted its ban against Fischer, who has done thousands of circumcisions in Rockland and around the world.
  
  Fischer uses his mouth to suction blood from the wound after he removes the foreskin. The centuries-old ritual, called metzizah bi peh, is used by Hasidic and ultra-Orthodox Jews.
  
  Many rabbis say Jewish law does not mandate mouth suction and a mohel is allowed to use a tube instead of the mouth. Others contend that it is mandated by Jewish law and that the spread of disease is rare.
  
  The case touches on public health and religious freedom.
  
  Fischer's method came under scrutiny when a Manhattan newborn died of herpes in November and his twin was diagnosed with the virus a little more than two weeks after the rabbi performed their circumcisions in October. A Staten Island newborn circumcised by Fischer was diagnosed with herpes in November. The strain of herpes found in the infants is transmitted orally.
  
  New York City took the rabbi to court to stop the practice. Pending the outcome of the city's investigation, a city judge has maintained a December temporary order preventing Fischer from performing the ritual circumcisions.
  
  Fischer underwent a herpes test, but the city has not released the results or commented on the type of test given to the rabbi. The state Health Department received the results through a subpoena, but also will not comment on them.
  
  Fischer's lawyer, Mark J. Kurzmann of Pearl River, said yesterday that "there has been no conclusive medical evidence that the infants contracted the virus from the rabbi."
  
  Kurzmann said the rabbi performed oral-suction circumcisions on two of the three infants, both of whom had rashes beforehand and had visited a doctor. Oral-suction circumcisions were done on the twins. Oral suction was not done on the third baby, Kurzmann said.
  
  "If there was a definitive conclusion that my client infected any child, he would be the first one to stop," Kurzmann said. "And Jewish law would mandate he stop."
  
  Kurzmann recently asked Rockland Health Commissioner Dr. Joan Facelle to lift the ban, which she ordered in February. Kurzmann based his request on the state Health Department's decision.
  
  Facelle said recently she remained concerned about the potential health risks the procedure imposes. She said her department has not received any reports of herpes in infants.
  
  She will respond to Kurzmann by the end of this month, hoping to receive guidance from the state.
  
  "This procedure poses a real potential health risk and doesn't follow infection control standards," she said.
  
  Facelle said neither the state nor the city has informed her if tests on the rabbi showed he had herpes and any link to the children.
  
  "In the absence of science, we are dealing with one particular individual, not the practice," she said. "I don't know if we can sustain the order. I am hoping for some guidance from the state."
  
  Facelle said even if she eventually rescinds her order, she plans to start an educational campaign in Rockland.
  
  State Health Department spokesman Rob Kenny said the agency has not yet decided how it would advise the county. Kenny also said Rockland can make its own decision without the state.
  
  The state has joined New York City's plan for a committee of rabbis and medical personnel to review the oral-suction procedure and possibly come up with guidelines.
  
  "We want to establish an open form of communication with all sides informed of the risk and the protocols when conducting these practices," Kenny said. "We want to make sure parents of newborns are aware of the potential health risks."

  By  Anonymous, at 3/15/2006 09:50:00 PM  

  ---

• What a brilliant invention for all those who have been robbed of a foreskin. I LOVE MY FORESKIN, but for those without this is what you're missing .....
  - It makes my cock look longer and bigger, especially bulging in my briefs
  - It protects my cock head, keeping it nice, soft and moist
  - It stops the cock head going all hard and de-sensitised
  - It gives me something extra to play with, and my partner too
  - I can balloon it up for fun by holding the end closed and peeing into it
  - I can jerk off without lube
  - I can catch all my cum in it, by holding the end closed
  - I can stretch it, roll it, pull it, tweak it
  - I can hide (small) stuff under it for added frisson
  - It moves itself when having sex
  - I pee straighter and more accurately with it rolled down
  - I can roll it back to look 'cut' if I want to
  - It stops my end chafing in my pants
  - It keeps me warm in winter
  - I can tie a bow round the end and be lead to bed by it
  - I can jerk off using just the tip end
  - It stops sand sticking to my cock head at the beach
  - It's cleaner, as I make an effort to make sure its folds are nicely washed
  - It's the same cock as I was born with, no unsightly or horrific looking scars
  - It's an intriguing play thing for inquisitive tongues
  - There's enough room to dock a friend's cock head in there too
  
  Let's face it, it's nature's nicest gift. As a second best, buy this replica and start having some fun!

  By  Happyskin, at 3/22/2006 08:20:00 AM  

  ---

• What a brilliant invention for all those who have been robbed of a foreskin. I LOVE MY FORESKIN, but for those without this is what you're missing .....
  - It makes my cock look longer and bigger, especially bulging in my briefs
  - It protects my cock head, keeping it nice, soft and moist
  - It stops the cock head going all hard and de-sensitised
  - It gives me something extra to play with, and my partner too
  - I can balloon it up for fun by holding the end closed and peeing into it
  - I can jerk off without lube
  - I can catch all my cum in it, by holding the end closed
  - I can stretch it, roll it, pull it, tweak it
  - I can hide (small) stuff under it for added frisson
  - It moves itself when having sex
  - I pee straighter and more accurately with it rolled down
  - I can roll it back to look 'cut' if I want to
  - It stops my end chafing in my pants
  - It keeps me warm in winter
  - I can tie a bow round the end and be lead to bed by it
  - I can jerk off using just the tip end
  - It stops sand sticking to my cock head at the beach
  - It's cleaner, as I make an effort to make sure its folds are nicely washed
  - It's the same cock as I was born with, no unsightly or horrific looking scars
  - It's an intriguing play thing for inquisitive tongues
  - There's enough room to dock a friend's cock head in there too
  
  Let's face it, it's nature's nicest gift. As a second best, buy this replica and start having some fun!

  By  Anonymous, at 3/22/2006 08:22:00 AM  

  ---

• i wish i had not had my baby son (now 2 years old) circumsised..i thought it would be healthier and everyone else i knew with a baby boy had it done and all the men i know are..i stayed in the room with him while the doctor did the surgery..my poor baby..i will never forget how he screamed and cried..his little arms and legs were strapped to the table and i watched the doctor cut bits of his skin away while he screamed..after a certain point the doctor attaches a clamp and he says the baby cant feel it anymore, he only cries because he is mad...and he finished...most mothers will usually be so careful when they touch an infant baby so as not to hurt them or wont let them lay on too rough a surface for fear they will bruise thier sensitive skin..but for some reason a lot of us decide its okay to take them to a doctor to have part of thier private parts torn off with a knife..i regret letting him be hurt, but even more i regret having made a decision about HIS body that cannot be undone.

  By  Anonymous, at 3/23/2006 11:18:00 AM  

  ---

• Funny how peeps say "Yuck!" about smegma beneath the foreskin. Do they say the same thing about "eye crispies?" or "snot?" It's all natural. Besides...they must be hanging out with real sleezos, if they have loads of it under their forskins, because, if cleaned each day, they won't FIND smegma under their foreskins. This is a great product, but the awareness it brings to the crime -- yes, maybe even "the first sexual abuse - of male circumcision is even better...

  By  Anonymous, at 3/28/2006 03:29:00 AM  

  ---

• As a female, I've seen both, experienced both, and enjoyed both....I preferr the look and taste without the foreskin, but that doesn't make it better. As long as the guy knows how to use the whole package, great.
  Ah yes, I know a boy who was circumcised at age 3 because he got a penile infection that lingered for about a year....he pissed his pants quite frequently because he could not feel when he had to pee....I know that this is abnormal, but just one instance of where people get the idea that foreskin can cause infection. The kid's mother was horrified and said the operation was a horrible thing, almost like killing her own child....so in any case, I can see both sides to the story. (i might also mention that this kid lives in Germany where they STILL hate both Jews and Turks, so the mother's primary concern was that her son would be like one of THEM.)

  By  Lucrezia Giustine Vitteriasi, at 3/28/2006 08:30:00 PM  

  ---

• Remember, you can play more notes with a trombone than with a bugle.

  By  Anonymous, at 4/10/2006 01:13:00 AM  

  ---

• My fiance was circumcised when he was two days old. His penis became kertainized which basically means that a protective callous formed over the entire length of his penis. Fingernails are made of keratin which is the same protective layer that forms over a circumcised penis. The difference can be seen here. http://www.circumstitions.com/Restric/Images/Comparison/glans-i-c.jpg The foreskin can have up to 20,000 nerve endings which are lost when a circumcision is performed depending on how much skin is taken off. Medical facilities get a double profit from circumcision. They get money from the circumcision itself and then the foreskins are often sold to companies such as Alpigrah and Organogenisis. Foreskins are also sold to some makeup companies to test their products. Anyway, my fiance was circumcised against his will and it has affected both of us. He is so desensitized that it takes us usually four hours for him to have just one orgasm and he claims that he can't really feel it when we make love. Most of the time it's like making love to a corpse because he is so desensitized. However, his circumcision was "perfect" in the eyes of the medical profession 100% successful with no complications directly afterwards. He was not a botched circumcision but one that was textbook perfect. We learned about foreskin restoration together and he started restoring. He gained a great deal of sensitivity back because his penis became an internal organ again like it's supposed to be...wrapped with foreskin. If you bathe properly that "dick cheese" or smegma will simply not be there or be an issue. Also, women produce smegma too. It's part of what gives a woman her natural odor. If a woman has a problem with being stinky all she has to do is wash down there and all is fine. We don't go and remove a woman's vulva because it will make it less smelly. That's just ridiculous. There are non surgical and very inexpensive ways you can restore your foreskin such as the t-tape method or an o-ring or you can buy a product such as this. Why would someone invent this you ask? It's for guys like my fiance who are so desensitized that having an orgasm can take hours even if they're alone because of their circumcision. It is also made for the many guys who are missing those 10,000 - 20,000 nerve endings because they were circumcised and want to regain some of that sensitivity. To those guys who are circumcised and think that there is no difference, try restoring or if you are uncircumcised try taping your foreskin back for a few days or weeks and feel the difference for yourself. I'm sure a lot of you who think there is no difference are just focusing on the fact that you get the same result anyway. Guys can have an orgasm with or without foreskin usually. Those who don't want to try to restore your foreskin, that's fine. I just hope you think of the women who have to sleep with you and how much better sex could be for both of you. ...And for those people who think that an uncircumcised penis looks better, would you ask your girl to cut off her clitoral hood because it "looks better?" ...Or if you are a girl, would you stay with your man if he was pressuring you into getting circumcised because he thought it looked better and was healthier for you? Think about it.

  By  Anonymous, at 4/12/2006 12:19:00 AM  

  ---

• The difficulties that it causes are manyfold to the extent that no excuses besides true and immediate medical ones can be tolerated.
  
  I am afraid that arguments of religion and tradition are not enough to cover the fact that someone is being robbed of the very basic right to control over what is almost always considered the most intimate part of their body besides the brain.

  By  Revamp, at 4/20/2006 08:35:00 PM  

  ---

• This is all a bunch of BS foreskin is great, and by the way its up to him if he wants his cock sliced or not all the cut guys who make fun of intact guys feel bad beacuse they are missing out on something that they were born with but then had it cut off. End of disscussion!!!!!

  By  Anonymous, at 6/05/2006 01:24:00 PM  

  ---

• Funny how people can be so defensive about their willy. However, contrary to some earlier posts, studies show that being circumcised does help prevent HIV infection:
  
  
  A three-year study involving 3,274 men aged 18 to 24 in a South African township suggested that circumcision reduced the risk of contracting HIV by 60 per cent . . . So conclusive were the results that the researchers stopped the study in July and offered circumcision to all the men taking part.

  By  Anonymous, at 6/14/2006 05:16:00 PM  

  ---

• I'am circumsised and i wish every god day that i wasn't.You circumsised guys out there ,including me, don't know what we are missing.Imagine having a stronger, more intence orgasm.
  I think i want it back ...Just pull the thing back when you have to pee...
  
  The senslip will help to get me close to how i should be if i were un-cut. I think i will try it.

  By  Anonymous, at 6/15/2006 03:19:00 AM  

  ---

• just looks gross and is not healthy

  By  Anonymous, at 6/18/2006 10:24:00 AM  

  ---

• I'm a girl. I think all penises are ugly. However, I prefer circumcised men to uncircumcised men. And it's not for health reasons. In my experience, uncircumcised men don't last as long as circumcised men.

  By  Anonymous, at 6/20/2006 05:24:00 PM  

  ---

• I am.. fortunately.. uncircumcised (personally I prefer the term foreskin enhanced or natural as the 'un' part always indicates a negative bias)
  
  Sure I get smegma. But what is it. Its a natural lubrication complete with antibacterial and antiviral secretions. Tt also contains natural phermones.
  
  To clean is easy - just pull back the skin and rinse. You brush your teeth each day and for a natrual guy its the same with the foreskin.
  
  I have a close friend who is circumcised, and have seen the mess that the doctors has done. its tight, bends his penis around, and when he gets erect you can see the tension in the skin. Almost like a overstretch condom!!!
  
  I hope this product will help him regain some of the sensitivity that he has losted

  By  Anonymous, at 6/22/2006 12:04:00 AM  

  ---

• OMG I have laughed my butt off reading this blog. Being Female I thought I could give my take on this.
  
  I saw the Faux foreskin on SNP and saw that more than 1000 people had commented so I wanted to see what was sooo interesting. You guys are so funny.
  
  I've seen both, been with both. I don't see a lot of difference except when it's soft. Either way they are kinda cute.
  
  Health wise??? lets think about hygiene guys. If you don't keep something clean and healthy it won't be.
  
  Lack of foreskin lessening the spread of AIDS... ok I can see that may work. But there again if your not working at keeping yourself healthy, if your engaging in non safe sex, then what should you expect. False security that if you get your foreskin taken off that it would then be ok for unsafe sex practices. Maybe more than forskin should be removed to stop the spread completely.... Just a thought.
  
  I choose to not have my son circumsized. IF he gets older and decides that he wishes for it to be taken away then he has that choice.
  
  So we won't have to buy Artificial retractable foreskin....
  
  Take care men of the world. Enjoy what you have, keep it clean and safe.
  
  Peace

  By  Anonymous, at 7/25/2006 09:09:00 PM  

  ---

• When I was a kid, I had phimosis. I used to pull back my foreskin over the head and it would stick. I did it one time and it didn't go back again for two months. My penis chaffed against my underwear, and the skin on the head of my penis peeled twice. This was 2 years ago, when I was sixteen. Finally, the forskin loosened and came back over the glands. Over the next couple months, I got the sensitivity back that I was missing and masturbation was way more enjoyable. My girlfriend loves when I don't wash, because she says the smell is really primitive and makes her horny. Well, basically, I learned to really value my foreskin because I know what its like to not have one. I used to kind of hate it but now I think its great. I love watching it go over my glands. My girlfriend said that she used to experience pain with cut guys and basically all she can forcus on with my dick is the pleasure. I f**king love my foreskin.

  By  Anonymous, at 8/10/2006 04:06:00 PM  

  ---

• Wow! I understand that everyone has a strong opinion about circumcision but it's really sad to me how many circumcised guys are ignorant when it comes to the foreskin. As if it's a foreign thing that isn't supposed to be there. It's one of the most sensitive parts of the body which serves a specific purpose. There is nothing dirty about it unless you are a dirty person who doesn't take a shower. The reason that most Americans are circumcised is because at the turn of the century they thought loosing your foreskin would prevent boys from masturbating which they thought would lead to blindess and insanity. That's how stupid they were. When they realized that circumcised guys could still masturbate, they began to say that it was healthier. When that myth was busted, fathers just wanted their boys to look like them. Now, American men and women are so used to a penis being circumcised that they think one that hasen't been is ugly. So many American males have been circumcised that Americans think that a normal penis is one that has the skin cut off of it. It's rediculous. Most guys in the world are not circumcised and foreskin is normal. If you get circumcised for religious reasons, then that is your right and I have nothing against that. But people should learn the medical & biological facts and world statistics before they start saying retarded stuff like foreskins are gross. There are plenty of circumcised guys that wished that they haden't been so this device, if it works will surely be welcomed by some.

  By  Anonymous, at 10/23/2006 09:10:00 PM  

  ---

• the only penis i care about is the one that goes in my mouth, i dont care if its cut or uncut,
  
  you people have nothing better todo than write all this junk , i have nothing better to do than to read it :-P

  By  Anonymous, at 10/26/2006 11:18:00 AM  

  ---

• Personally....intact penises are a million times better-no hurting, no not being able to finish, no premature ejaculation, and with the way the circ'd guys on here talk, ew! They obviously find it too difficult to clean their junk, so I wouldnt touch that with a 10 foot pole.

  By  Anonymous, at 11/15/2006 10:08:00 PM  

  ---

• Cut Vs Uncut?
  I've encountered both in my sex life, and honestly, I prefer cut for a few reasons.
  
  1. It looks better and cleaner.
  2. It usually IS cleaner (and I had an awful experience with an ex who had no personal hygiene.)
  3. Sex lasts longer.
  4. Oral sex is better without a foreskin.
  
  Yes, I can understand how some would see it as mutilation, but as I'm faced daily with comments on my various bod mods (piercings, tattoos, etc) being mutilations, I find it vaguely offensive.
  
  For many, it is a religious thing. Others, for medical reasons. And some, because the parents feel it is the better option.
  
  I can confidently say that if and when I have a son, he will be circumsized.
  
  But... Whichever it is, it's still a cock. As long as you boys keep clean, there's not much difference.

  By  Anonymous, at 11/30/2006 09:36:00 AM  

  ---

• I don't know what I would do with out my foreskin. On holiday's, I stuff mine with cornbeef, and serve it to my wife as a knish. Happy Hanukah!

  By  Anonymous, at 12/21/2006 07:48:00 PM  

  ---

• From taggy0urit@yahoo.com:
  Circumcision is discriminatation; it is aesthetic gender-biased prejudice and is a hateful way to teat boys.
  What if we put Swastikas on everyone at birth presuming the tattoos offered some form of spiritual protection or some kind of specious hygeinic benefit?
  If you wish to cut off your own foreskin, legs, give yourself a lobotomy...be my guest.
  Just don't practice hazing (circumcision)
  There is too much foreskin intolerance in society, and it's hateful.
  PO box 612 NY NY 10113-0612 USA

  By  taggy0urit, at 2/07/2007 03:47:00 PM  

  ---

• It is amazing the amount of misinformation in these posts. Apart from the obvious religious traditions, the most common spread of circumcision has been the expansion of the British Empire as it was for about four hundred years. It became common for the well-to-do families who provided sons as officers in the armed forces, governors and civil servants to adopt the practice for its health benefits in serving in the far flung parts of the work. That is how it came to America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and other British colonies. It is only since 1948 in Britain with the national health that payments for the simple op were discontinued to save money and in many other countries like Canada and New Zealand as well in recent times. In Australia with the pressure for services in public hospitals and as an elective surgery it was discontinued. It is still available in the private system and attracts a Medicare rebate. In Britain sons born in the private system, including most Royals, can avail themselves of this and there are also special clinics under National Heath being included. For reliable information look up circlist.com or circinfo.com.
  It should be a decision for individual families and not ridiculed by either side. Some males really need it and benefit from it and many don't need it at all.

  By  Anonymous, at 3/03/2007 11:40:00 PM  

  ---

• This product is a very good idea, but slightly expensive.
  By the time a circumcised man is in his 40s his glans has about the same sensitivity as the tip of his elbow or as some have said their fingernails. Protecting the glans from the day-to-day friction of clothing helps recover some sensitivity. A more permanent but time-consuming solution is non-surgical foreskin restoration; this uses tissue expansion by tension.
  Would female "circumcision" that ONLY removes 70% of the nerves be acceptable? That is what a boy looses. The nerves that are left are basically pain receptors, quite deficient for sensual touch.
  No male "needs" mutilation, some need better doctors that can treat the rare problems that an intact male might have. The primitive tribes should get over their pee-pee mutilation fetish, or go back out into the desert.

  By  mornnwudy, at 3/11/2007 10:33:00 AM  

  ---

• OK, OK. I don't think this product would be appropriate for me.
  But that's no skin off my nose.

  By  Nobby Chopper, at 3/13/2007 05:16:00 AM  

  ---

• Firstly and foremostly, I am an american, and as such was mutilated at birth against any choice of my own. This is in direct contradiction of our american ideal of self-ownership, and I find it a disguisting display of tyranny. It has been ruled in our country that there is no legal rememedy for this, or I would have taken it to civil court, I assure you. When will you barbarians realize that each person belongs to their own self and that your children are not your property to fashion after your own image? Tyranny cannot be explained away regardless of the situation. May god come from heaven and let me cut off his penis, I think not. This is why american atheists make more sense than you "wankers" jewish or otherwise. For you, servitude is common, as you will serve god for all of eternity. For me, I am free, I own myself, and I will stay that way for all of time. My children will neither find themselves imprisoned in hell nor enslaved to a god who would have them kiss his ass for all of time. My children, as all humans, have nothing but oblivion to look forward to after death. Oblivion is nothing to fear, it is the great equalizer, and it guarantees that weak and apathetic men who never bother to leave their living rooms or ask why don't get to leave their stain on history.

  By  Anonymous, at 3/17/2007 10:59:00 AM  

  ---

• Dradle anyone?

  By  Anonymous, at 6/09/2007 04:55:00 PM  

  ---

• I'm always amazed at the heat this topic generates.
  
  We seem to be really passionate about our genitalia, don't we? We either want to justify our cut or uncut status, or condemn those who practice differently than we'd like. I wish there was a way to discuss this without blaming and judging one another. I keep struggling to put my opinion in a non-judgmental way, and I keep deleting my failed attempts. This even though I have been studying the art of communicating compassionately for years now--see www.cnvc.org to see what I'm talking about.
  
  That's a lot of passion for 15 square inches of tissue.

  By  Anonymous, at 6/13/2007 02:28:00 AM  

  ---

• Just to add to it, I was "mutilated" but at no fault to anyone, it was just my body messing me about, I had a perfectly good foreskin when I was a young boy, then when older it stopped working and had to have it removed, I look at myself now and think it's discusting, I would rather have one any day, I would do anything to have a normal penis again, I want what I was born with back. But I won't be buying a fake one though, it's not the same colour as my body lol, it'll put me off more I think, but my partner say's itis more healthy, and I do last allot longer in bed even for my first time lol, so I shoudln't really complain, it still keeps her happy, I have a 14 month old baby so it wrks for us both, thats all that counts, as for sex like I said it just takes me longer to go thats all, but I still ove it.

  By  Anonymous, at 7/13/2007 09:07:00 AM  

  ---

• It is so sad that the reality of the effects of circumcision arn't apparent until middle age. It is then that the value of a more sensitive penis is realised. My partners sister has a circumcised husband and in order to get enough stimulation to achieve orgasm, he pounds away for ages, often causing discomfort to her, and often giving it up as hopeless. But old Jewish men aint going to addmit to that are they?

  By  Anonymous, at 7/24/2007 01:54:00 AM  

  ---

• i have read all your comments and i am absolutely flabberghasted at all the bad remarks made to each other. and some of the comments are utterly ridiculous too. it sounds like most of you dont actually know what you are talking about.
  i was circumcised at 35yrs old due to a medical problem inside my penis, so i know what sex was like with a forskin and i know what it is like without. i know that there is a great deal of sensitivity loss, and there is a thickening of the glans, so i bought a pack of these "forskins", which i wear everyday. when used properly, like i have done over the past 6 weeks i have all the sensations and feelings that i used to have when i had a foreskin.
  On a personal note, circumcision is a totally un-necessary procedure, and the long term effects are damaging, but i have no objection to anyone doing it to themselves or having it done to themselves, but i dont agree with mutilating a baby just for the sake of religion, but then again like i said, thats my view. you have your views, just dont push em onto everyone else. especially those of you who have never had a foreskin with which to compare to a circumcised penis.

  By  Anonymous, at 9/10/2007 04:34:00 PM  

  ---

• I'm sure this is a great product for those who don't have a natural foreskin and would like one. Personally, I won't be buying any. I have never found anything in any way appealing about a foreskin and have always been glad that I don't have one. That's just my view. Good luck to those who like them!
  
  I hope no-one puts one of these things in my stocking at Christmas. I know my wife wouldn't. She prefers the "streamlined" version!
  
  Pete

  By  Anonymous, at 9/26/2007 04:05:00 AM  

  ---

• I hate being circumcised. If I had been given the choice I would have kept my foreskin. Its not fair that parents are allowed to make those sorts of decisions. In fact I have been considering restoring my foreskin. People who are not bound by religious traditions should be allowed to choose what they want to do. I do not criticize people who were circumcised for religious tradition. I critize routine circumcision. There is absolutely no reason for routine circumcision. Doctors that recommend the procedure are full of shit. Every single aspect of the human anotomy was designed by nature to be perfect. Some people say the foreskin is useless like the appendix. Well doctors now know that the appendix is a part of the immune system. Most of the time when circumcision in small children is recommended is when some shit face tries to forcibly retract the foreskin. The foreskin is fused to the glans in infants and does not retract until puberty. People who feel that there foreskin has no pleasure to it, have probably been forcibly retracted. Forcible retraction kills tons of the nerves that would have developed in the glans and foreskin had it been left alone. Doctors who reccomend routine circumcision, might as well circumcise themselves if they are not already circumcised, and while their at it they might as well remove their teeth to prevent cavaties or their tonsils to prevent tonsillitis. Routine circumcision is done for bullshit reasons by doctors who have no reasoning. Part of it is because the foreskin is the only thing routinely removed at birth. The doctors should cut themselves with their scalpal for such stupidity and ignorance.

  By  Anonymous, at 10/04/2007 02:19:00 PM  

  ---

• I'm circumsized and not jewish, u wana know something?
  
  Without foreskin it could be a little more unsensitive but believe me, the intercourse lasts longer and hell! women never complain, they could have more multiple orgasms.
  
  The real thing is in your brain, if you know how make a woman scream for pleasure it's not because of the foreskin it's because of the experience with women
  ; )
  
  with a little lub on the cock things are different

  By  xarloba, at 10/09/2007 07:43:00 PM  

  ---

• remember what bobby fischer said about his own people? He said it himself, Jews mutilate their kids. I can tell you personally, i RESTORED my foreskin using thr Tug a hoy and it feels
  SO MUCH BETTERR HOLY CRAP. In fact it feeels soooooo good that i watch like an hour of porn a day now...i am OBSESSED with pussy i cant take it anymore but once i find a way to handle this immense pleasure, ill be ok.

  By  BabakTheOldSport, at 10/29/2007 10:45:00 PM  

  ---

• I have not read all the entries but I couldn't pass when seeing a post declare circumsicion as a beautiful religious rite and then take acception to the term mutilation. By definition "mutilation" is the removal of any body part. In my opinion to take an infant who is dependent upon your protection and love and ritualistically torture and mutilate in the name of God is an affront to humanity and certainly should be prosecuted. If you want the truth google "circumcision". Remember that by definition 1/2 of the populace is below average intelligence.

  By  Anonymous, at 11/25/2007 11:58:00 AM  

  ---

• this thread is fucking crazy....i should track each and every one of you down and sodomize all of you with razor blades.

  By  Tadd, at 1/02/2008 02:27:00 AM  

  ---

• Three points:
  1. The American Medical Council have recently decreeded there are no advantages for circumcision.
  2. The average American GP (family doctor) makes $80,000 a year from circumcisions, and
  3. The British took the practice around the world because it was 'fashionable' at the time of their Empire building. (S Africa, Ausralia, New Zealand and Canada. Many tribes in Africa were already circumcising. The practice did not 'catch on' in India.
  
  There will always be a need for the occasional circumcision for purely medical reasons, but even today, here in the UK, some doctors do not explore non surgical solutions properly, before getting the scalpel out! I agree with those who say the decision for this operation should not be taken (except for emergency medical reasons) until the guy is old enough to choose for himself.A

  By  Anonymous, at 2/15/2008 01:04:00 AM  

  ---

• I had my foreskin and was circumstance in my late 20's so i know the different... there is more sexual pleasure with the foreskin cuz my head was more sensitive and now it is dry and less sensitive. Even though i can still cum and have sex but it is not as great as it is with the foreskin... arguement over.

  By  Anonymous, at 4/01/2008 06:35:00 PM  

  ---

• my mother had me circumcised 3 months ofter birth. NOTHING was wrong with me. my wife wishes I still had my foreskin. THANKS MOM! just who has to live with it in the first place? circumcision is your lifes first phucking, and you get it from your parents. what will my mom get in return from me, NO GRAND CHILDREN!IF MORE GUYS DID THIS IT WOULD STOP. BUT THEN THE MALES IN THE UNITED STATES ARE LAZY PUSSYS ANYWAYS. I wish I could give all the problems I have had from being circumcised to my mom,let here live with them, she wanted it the first place. only wish I could return the favor. any of you pro circ's don't answer me with your BULL-SHIT.

  By  xxxx, at 4/23/2008 02:03:00 AM  

  ---

• I am 68 now and I had a foreskin up until 19 years ago when for some reason it started getting very tight. The medical recommendation was circumcision which I agreed to in the absence of proper advice on the cons as opposed to the pros of the procedure.
  I now find myself lumbered with an insensitive penis compared with the way it used to be and it has been much harder to get a good erection since.
  There are often good reasons for what sometimes seems an extraneous part of the body and I would advise no one to have bits of themselves chopped off or mutilated unless it is absolutely necessary.
  I'm prepared to be corrected but my understanding of the Bible is that Jewish circumcision is a man-made tradition rather than God-made law.

  By  Anonymous, at 5/23/2008 08:49:00 AM  

  ---

• genital mutilation.

  By  Anonymous, at 6/19/2008 03:15:00 PM  

  ---

• You people are frothing at the mouth over FORESKIN. Unless you're Jewish, this argument serves no purpose. Try CareerBuilder.com .

  By  Anonymous, at 6/27/2008 04:52:00 PM  

  ---

• I'm an orthodox jewish heeb, and just to prove it-happy Gimmel Tammuz to all (Chabad) Lubavitchers out there. Now, there is a way to prove this thing about pleasure/not, with or without the little grrribin. Just ask someone who was mature enough to have had intercouse by the time they had a circumcision, how it felt before and after.
  I went to yeshiva and i did hear from a mohel once, that it says in some sefer,(book), that-yes, the reason for circumscision is to take away an itty little bit of pleasure. that our entire lives shouldn't be steeped in sex and revolve around it. some commentary even took it a step further and asked, "if so, why not cut off the whole penis?" the answer "God wants us to experience sexual pleasure, but just not THAT much." so in other words it's like tithing one tenth of your sexual pleasure to god/religion/whatever, and focusing on other stuff. (I'd take the other 90% anytime anywhere, with most half attractive people's of the opposite sex :) }---

  By  Anonymous, at 7/06/2008 12:07:00 AM  

  ---

• I like to wash my dick!

  By  Anonymous, at 7/18/2008 02:24:00 AM  

  ---

• haha im loving all you circumsized guys saying youd rather have it your way when really you wouldnt know what your missing out on since you lost your chicken skin at birth. man id hate to have a desensitized penis. i dont wana grow old to 60 and give up on sex coz my old man penis has lost all sensitivity from decades of no skin. flag. and whats all this shit about bacteria? your whole bodies covered in bacteria, its life. have a shower. deal with it. and i LOL'd at the dude who said cirumcision prevents aids hahaha.

  By  Anonymous, at 10/22/2008 01:01:00 AM  

  ---

• Seriously WHO CARES?!?!
  
  LOL! Way too much though tis going into other guys penises here!
  
  Stop thinking with your small heads and use the blood to power the head on your shoulders.
  
  For uncircumssized men out there...ENJOY yourselves!
  
  For the circumsized men out there...ENJOY yourselves as well since you will never really know hat you are missing if anything at all.
  
  If you are curious as to what you are missing...try buying the product as that was the original thought behind the thread!
  
  Too many penises in this forum. Going to go find a nice Fora-whore and look at some pr0n!
  
  Ciao!

  By  Anonymous, at 11/18/2008 10:53:00 AM  

  ---

• Circumsision is mutilation. I've heard of many a crying baby boy lose their entire penis during a botched circumcision. Some parents even decided to remove the baby boys testicles and make him a girl. Needless to say these poor boys eventually commit suicide. Why impose this misery onto someone? For what?

  By  Anonymous, at 1/03/2009 11:04:00 PM  

  ---

• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIMln76nSXI
  
  and the truth shall set ye free

  By  Anonymous, at 1/27/2009 01:29:00 PM  

  ---

Post a Comment
Back to Homepage